The feel of the face and contours the body already formed a long history of human development. It forms a precedent and the standard in the sense of so-called beauty. Curve and the balance of the body even as the foundation of the art standards in architecture and even literature. So given that the human body is implicitly factors, all of life and the eyes are the first means for us to perceive the real world there is nothing difficult to understand why the art of the nude so popular.
We consider the nudity to satisfy curiosity and to find the "orgasm" of the soul. It is not reasonable because of the fundamental goals is to bring art to the spiritual satisfaction to people there?They say only men like to watch new nude women do typically have insufficient. It's really not correct! Women also need to perceive this art school. However, because women are often subject to scrutiny or defamation is "damaged" if caught nude photos. Judgmental people on the go instead of sick dread they often lack the psychological men, old-fashioned and patriarchal.
Through the media, we can see there are two opposing viewpoints about the nude. A division shall regard it as a catalyst and "pleasure" of art. But then again some people are nude photos of the sick society. So when the nude photos are considered art and when is not?When is Art ... and when not?
In the arts, painting, sculpture and literature, this is a fairly common question, and also spend a lot of paper and pen ... saliva to debate. The problem still lies in the artist's intentions. They want to share something? confirms the expenses? Or just want to tease, tantalize curiosity? Or work purposes only stimulates lust or nudity only plays a minor role and nothing to do with the message of the work? We rarely know the exact intentions of the author and self-evaluate "nude" work under a sense of its own. Problems start to arise from this point you there: DYou can feel sexy photos an artistic way but in the eyes of others it is the pornographic and vulgar. No commitment to say is the most accurate or superior. The debate over so-called Nude Nude art and profanity will not stop still continues.
However, there is a boundary that we can get out while enjoying the nude work. Do you ever drink yet? When alcohol consumption is attributable to the body, but it would not be good if you drink too much and get drunk. Enjoy the nude too. If you see the quality of its art is so good, but if you start to see it as a means to satisfy their own sexuality, it is not art anymore.It's hard to express clearly this delicate line. Nonetheless remains that we still are human and humans is also a failure for the same ... higher animals. No one is no ... "animalistic" in person, especially when exposed to the nudity is still dancing on the network daily. Whether art is more or less to have some "side effects" is not everyone excited. However, if you know the balance and moderation as alcohol, it will no longer a problem where.
Therefore, according to her, a nude work is artistic or not, remain at the feel and the ability to regulate your sexuality. Never blame the artist, model or photographer.Are not we also formerly a savage that star, so that when we look back today nude pictures that we say, depraved cultural products Why look at a picture when small children did not wear them we again say, "Oh how lovely that that! "But when looking at a girl in a nude photo we grimaced and shook his head. The obscenity is in the per person only. Open your heart a little you will see nude photos is also a break in the art dotted here :)